Shouldn’t it be (\r\n)+|\r+|\n+
?
“+” will only apply to the immediately preceding character. “\r\n” needs to be grouped. I believe “\r\n+” is functionally equivalent to “\r\n|\n+”.
Shouldn’t it be (\r\n)+|\r+|\n+
?
“+” will only apply to the immediately preceding character. “\r\n” needs to be grouped. I believe “\r\n+” is functionally equivalent to “\r\n|\n+”.